Vial sort← Latest work

The August evaluation

π0.5 at 12k steps, with its vision–language backbone frozen, ran 79 times over 15 commands on the Jetson Thor rig, 22–24 August 2026. A person scored every rollout.

Each command was run 5 or 7 times. In 13 commands the vial starts in a slot the demonstrations used; in 2 it starts in slot 2 or 5, which no demonstration used. The scorer marked each rollout as a complete success or not, and noted a missed pickup, a missed drop and any collision.

Where the takes are lost

In the order a take happens. The first grasp is the largest loss; getting past it is not enough.

  1. Rollouts79
  2. Grasped the vial on the first try36 of 79 (46%)
  3. Then completed the move16 of 36 (44%)

Another 4 rollouts completed after missing the first grasp, so 20 of 79 (25%) in all. The vial was let go away from its destination in 15 rollouts (19%). A collision happened in 10, never on its own.

Every command

Click a command in either chart to watch its trials below.

Completed rollouts per command

The dot is the share of rollouts that completed the move; the line is its 95% Wilson interval. With 5 rollouts a command, the intervals are wide.

  • Source slot used in training
  • Source slot held out of training
Show the numbers
CommandSource slot in trainingRolloutsCompletedRate95% interval
L6 → R6yes5480%38%–96%
R1 → L3yes5360%23%–88%
R3 → L6yes5360%23%–88%
L5 → R3no5240%12%–77%
R2 → binno5240%12%–77%
L3 → R1yes5120%4%–62%
L4 → R1yes5120%4%–62%
L4 → R3yes5120%4%–62%
L3 → L6yes5120%4%–62%
R3 → L3yes5120%4%–62%
L1 → R1yes7114%3%–51%
L1 → R3yes700%0%–35%
L3 → R3yes500%0%–43%
L4 → binyes500%0%–43%
R6 → L6yes500%0%–43%

Pooled, rollouts with a held-out source slot completed more often (4 of 10) than those with a trained one (16 of 69), but the intervals overlap and the held-out rate rests on two commands. It is not evidence that the policy generalises; those two slots may simply be easier to grasp.

How far each command’s rollouts got

Each rollout counted once: complete, otherwise a missed pickup, otherwise a missed drop. The rest picked the wrong vial or used the wrong slot.

  • Missed the pickup
  • Wrong vial or slot
  • Missed the drop
  • Complete
Show the numbers
CommandMissed the pickupWrong vial or slotMissed the dropCompleteRollouts
L6 → R610045
R1 → L310135
R3 → L610135
L5 → R320125
R2 → bin10225
L3 → R130115
L4 → R130115
L4 → R331015
L3 → L631015
R3 → L303115
L1 → R151017
L1 → R330407
L3 → R340105
L4 → bin40105
R6 → L650005

Ordered left to right by how far the take got, in one blue ramp that stands out more the further the take got.

Watch the trials

Side, top and wrist cameras, as the run was recorded for scoring: about 3.5 frames a second, so motion looks jumpy. Full-rate demonstrations are in the August datasets.

One rollout of each outcome

The side camera of four scored trials.

Trained on, and done well, slot by slot

The 150 demonstrations against the evaluation, on the rack layout: the bin, the left rack and the right rack, slots 1 to 6 from left to right as the side camera sees them.

  • Demonstrations:
  • under 15
  • 15–19
  • 20–24
  • 25–29
  • 30 or more
  • Completed:
  • under 20%
  • 20–39%
  • 40–59%
  • 60–79%
  • 80% or more
Training demonstrations, by the slot they took the vial from
L1 as the source: 17 demonstrations17L2 as the source: 0 demonstrations0L3 as the source: 18 demonstrations18L4 as the source: 21 demonstrations21L5 as the source: 0 demonstrations0L6 as the source: 21 demonstrations21R1 as the source: 19 demonstrations19R2 as the source: 0 demonstrations0R3 as the source: 19 demonstrations19R4 as the source: 21 demonstrations21R5 as the source: 0 demonstrations0R6 as the source: 14 demonstrations14The bin is never a source
Evaluation rollouts completed, by the slot they took the vial from
L1 as the source: 1 of 14 rollouts completed1/14L2 as the source: no rollouts–L3 as the source: 2 of 15 rollouts completed2/15L4 as the source: 2 of 15 rollouts completed2/15L5 as the source: 2 of 5 rollouts completed2/5L6 as the source: 4 of 5 rollouts completed4/5R1 as the source: 3 of 5 rollouts completed3/5R2 as the source: 2 of 5 rollouts completed2/5R3 as the source: 4 of 10 rollouts completed4/10R4 as the source: no rollouts–R5 as the source: no rollouts–R6 as the source: 0 of 5 rollouts completed0/5The bin is never a source
Training demonstrations, by where they put the vial
L1 as the destination: 25 demonstrations25L2 as the destination: 0 demonstrations0L3 as the destination: 20 demonstrations20L4 as the destination: 0 demonstrations0L5 as the destination: 0 demonstrations0L6 as the destination: 20 demonstrations20R1 as the destination: 20 demonstrations20R2 as the destination: 0 demonstrations0R3 as the destination: 15 demonstrations15R4 as the destination: 0 demonstrations0R5 as the destination: 0 demonstrations0R6 as the destination: 20 demonstrations20The bin as the destination: 30 demonstrations30
Evaluation rollouts completed, by where the vial had to go
L1 as the destination: no rollouts–L2 as the destination: no rollouts–L3 as the destination: 4 of 10 rollouts completed4/10L4 as the destination: no rollouts–L5 as the destination: no rollouts–L6 as the destination: 4 of 15 rollouts completed4/15R1 as the destination: 3 of 17 rollouts completed3/17R2 as the destination: no rollouts–R3 as the destination: 3 of 22 rollouts completed3/22R4 as the destination: no rollouts–R5 as the destination: no rollouts–R6 as the destination: 4 of 5 rollouts completed4/5The bin as the destination: 2 of 10 rollouts completed2/10

With 5 rollouts a command, success does not follow how many demonstrations a command had. R1 → L3 had no demonstration of that exact move and completed 3 of 5; L4 → bin had 3 and completed none. Slots 2 and 5 were never a source in training, and slots 2, 4 and 5 never a destination.

What these numbers cannot say

Five rollouts a command is enough to see the failure modes, not to rank commands: the intervals above are 35 to 65 percentage points wide. The scores come from one person watching each run. The v5 evaluation tests one checkpoint of one recipe on one rig; the October results show what the later runs did.